NAC AND FOSOB GO TO COURT TO
ENFORCE COURT’S ORDER, SEEK REMOVAL OF “NUDITY PROHIBITED” SIGNS
NAC has issued an update regarding the Petition for a Writ of Prohibition:
**********************************************************************
NATURIST ACTION COMMITTEE
UPDATE
**********************************************************************
http://www.naturistaction.org
**********************************************************************
Copyright 2008 by the Naturist Action Committee, which is
responsible for its content. Permission is granted for the posting, forwarding
or redistribution of this message, provided that it is reproduced in its
entirety and without alteration.
DATE: October 3, 2008
SUBJECT: San Onofre Update
TO: All naturists and other concerned citizens
Dear Naturist,
The beach at Trail 6 of San Onofre State Beach remains clothing-optional,
thanks to quick and successful action by the Naturist Action Committee (NAC)
and tremendous support from individual naturists and organizations. However,
the battle for San Onofre is far from being over. This NAC Update is intended
to provide you with current information on this important situation.
A BRIEF RECAP OF RECENT EVENTS
A California Superior Court ruled in August in favor of NAC in its lawsuit
against the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR). DPR had
attempted earlier this year to bypass state law regarding changes to public
regulations, moving suddenly after more than 30 years to end the traditional
clothing-optional use of a small portion of San Onofre State Beach in
In its order, the Court declared, "Dept of Parks must comply with the
provisions of the California Administrative Procedures Act before it makes any
changes in its enforcement." Further, the Court said, "until the administrative process is completed, Parks shall
maintain the status quo, and enforce the Cahill Policy as it has done since its
issuance and subsequent interpretation by the
WHAT'S NEW?
As NAC had anticipated, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has
appealed the order. Meanwhile, DPR has refused to remove the "Nudity
Prohibited" signs that it had installed at San Onofre as part of its plan
to ban naturist use of the beach.
Additionally, DPR personnel are misinforming the visiting public by telling them
that there are no clothing optional areas at San Onofre and by saying that
nudity is illegal south of Trail 6.
The signs and intentional misinformation are chilling, and they violate the
Court's order to return to the status quo and the traditional enforcement of
the Cahill/Harrison regulation. Earlier this week, NAC petitioned the Court of
Appeals for a writ that would require removal of the signs and put a halt to DPR's campaign of misinformation at San Onofre State Beach.
DPR has until October 13 to respond.
NAC THANKS YOU!
When the Naturist Action Committee asked for your grass roots participation
in contacting the Director of DPR, you responded magnificently. Many of you are
demonstrating through your generous contributions to NAC that you understand
the significant expense associated with the Naturist Action Committee's
important defense of naturism on public lands. NAC continues to rely on your
support.
Friends of San Onofre Beach, NAC's
co-plaintiff in the lawsuit, has done meaningful local fund raising.
Also worthy of special mention is the gracious contribution made to NAC by the
members of AANR-West.
NAC thanks all those who are choosing to make a difference!
MORE INFORMATION
Details of this situation and specifics of the Cahill/Harrison Regulation
and associated documents may be found on the NAC Web page: www.naturistaction.org/sanonofre
There, you will find background documents and important files related to NAC's lawsuit, including NAC's
recent petition for a writ to force removal of the "Nudity
Prohibited" signs.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
The Naturist Action Committee is in this for the long haul. Our successes
have been significant, but no one should imagine that
NAC will continue to issue Action Alerts, Advisories and Updates on this issue
as circumstances require. Look for them.
PLEASE HELP NAC TO CONTINUE HELPING NATURISTS!
NAC is committed to the defense of clothing-optional use of public land.
NAC does not hesitate to hire lawyers and lobbyists when it becomes necessary,
but that can be very expensive. NAC does not have a membership roster on which
it can simply assess dues. NAC relies entirely on the voluntary support of
people like YOU.
Won't you please send a generous donation to:
NAC
PO Box 132
Or call toll free (800) 886-7230 (8AM-4PM, Central Time, weekdays) to
donate by phone using your MasterCard, Visa or Discover Card. Or use your
credit card to make a convenient online donation: www.naturistaction.org/donate/
Thank you for choosing to make a difference.
Naturally,
Bob Morton
Executive Director
Naturist Action Committee
---------------------------------------------------------------
Naturist Action Committee (NAC) - PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903
Executive Dir. Bob Morton - execdir@naturistaction.org
Board Member Allen Baylis - rab@baylislaw.com
Online Rep. Dennis Kirkpatrick - naturist@sunclad.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FILES APPEAL OF SUPERIOR COURT
RULING
On September 2, the DPR filed a Notice of Appeal indicating their intent to seek appellate review of Judge Shelia Fell’s ruling in favor of NAC and FOSOB. Needless to say, this will add to the legal fees already incurred. Please continue to send donations to Friends of San Onofre Beach or the Naturist Action Committee.
Donations can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre Beach
Donations can also be made to the Naturist Action Committee: www.naturistaction.org/donate
Today, the Naturist Action Committee issued the following Update:
**********************************************************************
NATURIST ACTION COMMITTEE
UPDATE
**********************************************************************
http://www.naturistaction.org
**********************************************************************
Copyright
2008 by the Naturist Action Committee, which is responsible for its content.
Permission is granted for the posting, forwarding or redistribution of this
message, provided that it is reproduced in its entirety and without alteration.
DATE:
September 3, 2008
SUBJECT: NAC goes back to court over San Onofre
TO: Naturists and other concerned citizens
Dear Naturist,
As a result
of the Naturist Action Committee's recent victory in court, the traditional
clothing-optional portion of San Onofre State Beach remains open for nude use,
the Cahill/Harrison Regulation has been recognized as a state regulation, and
no citations for mere nudity are being issued at the beach. NAC's
win is significant and meaningful. However, no one should imagine that it's the
last word in this matter.
As NAC has anticipated, the
California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) has
filed its intent to appeal the recent Superior Court ruling. NAC has already
prepared for the state's appeal and will meet that challenge in the Appellate
Court. The California Attorney General's office is representing the DPR. To
succeed, the AG will have to convince the Appellate Court that Superior Court
Judge Sheila Fell "abused her discretion." That's a very difficult
case to make.
In her ruling just a week ago, Judge Fell said, "until the administrative
process is completed, Parks shall maintain the status quo, and enforce the
Cahill Policy as it has done since its issuance and subsequent interpretation
by the
MORE INFORMATION
Details of this situation and specifics of the Cahill Policy and associated
documents may be found on the Web page: www.naturistaction.org/sanonofre
WHAT IS NAC ASKING YOU TO DO?
This is a NAC Update. NAC is not asking for your specific action at this
time. Please watch for NAC Action Alerts, Advisories and Updates on this
important topic.
PLEASE HELP NAC TO CONTINUE HELPING NATURISTS!
NAC is committed to the defense of traditional clothing-optional use of
public land. We are an organization of grass roots activists, but we do not
hesitate to hire lawyers and lobbyists when it becomes necessary, as in the
case of San Onofre. The defense of naturism can be very expensive, and NAC
relies entirely on the voluntary financial support of people like YOU.
Please consider a generous donation to NAC.
NAC
If you wish, you may call toll free (800) 886-7230 (8AM-4PM, Central Time,
weekdays) to donate by phone using your MasterCard, Visa or Discover Card. Or
you may use your credit card to make a convenient online donation: www.naturistaction.org/donate/
Thank you for choosing to make a difference.
Naturally,
Bob Morton
Executive Director
Naturist Action Committee
---------------------------------------------------------------
Naturist Action Committee (NAC) - PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903
Executive Dir. Bob Morton - execdir@naturistaction.org
Board Member Allen Baylis - rab@baylislaw.com
Online Rep. Dennis Kirkpatrick - naturist@sunclad.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 8-27-08
COURT ISSUES FINAL RULING IN FAVOR OF NATURISTS
IN SUIT AGAINST DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Late in the afternoon on August 27, Judge Shelia Fell issued her FINAL ruling on our Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The final ruling mirrored the tentative ruling of August 19. This ruling affirms the fact that nudity is legal at Trail 6 (and all other traditional clothing optional areas within the State Parks) unless a complaint is received from a member of the public. Also, the ruling affirms that the Department must conduct public hearings in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act prior to making any changes in its enforcement policy regarding nudity within the State Parks.
The Court’s final ruling can be seen here: Final Ruling
Where do we go from here? The DPR essentially has three choices. First, it may choose to move forward with the proposed change in policy and proceed in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act. Second, they may appeal the Court’s ruling that came out today. Or, third, they may choose to simply stick with the existing policy. It is our hope that if they choose to retain the status quo, we will be able to work with the DPR in order to improve the park for the benefit of all the visitors and employees of the DPR alike. In any case, the Naturist Action Committee and Friends of San Onofre Beach are ready to proceed in which ever manner is appropriate depending on what path DPR chooses to take.
We deeply appreciate the support of all of you who participated in making this ruling possible, whether by writing letters, making donations or simply kind words of encouragement on the beach. Keep up the good work!
This should be a reminder to everyone of the importance of
being affiliated with a national organization that supports clothing optional beaches
and understands exactly how to protect and advance the rights of naturists. I
strongly encourage each of you to join The
Naturist Society. It is TNS and its political adjunct, the Naturist Action Committee that have
brought their expertise and national clout to the table to make this effort a
success. Because of NAC’s involvement, people from
all across
Allen Baylis
President, Friends of San Onofre Beach
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 8-21-08
Late in the afternoon on August 19, Judge Shelia Fell issued her TENTATIVE ruling on our Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The tentative ruling stated:
Naturist Action v CA State
Dept of Parks & Rec
OSC re Writ of Mandate
14
Dept of Parks must
submit changes in the regulation to the procedures set forth in the
Administrative Procedure Act. Further, until the administrative process
is completed, Dept of Parks shall maintain the status quo, and enforce the
Cahill Policy as it has done since its issuance and subsequent interpretation
by the
Clearly, the judge found our position persuasive, and legally correct.
Yesterday, August 20, the hearing on our Petition was heard
at 10:00 in
Shortly after the hearing, the news media gathered and interviewed some of the participants in the hearing. Also, the Naturist Action Committee issued an update which is reproduced below. Additionally, NAC has posted more information and documents on it’s San Onofre dedicated webpage: http://naturistaction.org/sanonofre/ Please visit this page and become more familiar with all the issues and history behind clothing optional use at San Onofre and other State Parks.
The battle is not over yet. Even if we ultimately prevail at
this stage, the government is not likely to give up on its efforts to restrict
our liberty by closing San Onofre to clothing optional recreation. So, the continued support of all of you who value our
small stretch of beach is vital to winning this battle.
Donations can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre Beach
Donations can also be made to the Naturist Action Committee: www.naturistaction.org/donate
Here is the NAC Update:
**********************************************************************
NATURIST ACTION COMMITTEE
UPDATE
**********************************************************************
http://www.naturistaction.org
**********************************************************************
Copyright 2008 by the Naturist Action Committee, which
is responsible for its content. Permission is granted for the posting,
forwarding or redistribution of this message, provided that it is reproduced in
its entirety and without alteration.
DATE: August 20, 2008
SUBJECT: Judge postpones ruling in NAC's San Onofre
lawsuit
TO: Naturists and other concerned citizens
Dear Naturist,
The Naturist Action Committee wishes to update you briefly concerning an
intermediate step in the battle to preserve a portion of San Onofre State Beach
for clothing-optional use.
As many of you are aware, today is the day a California Superior Court had
designated for issuing a ruling in the lawsuit the Naturist Action Committee
(NAC) has filed against the California Department of Parks and Recreation
(DPR). Earlier this year, DPR had attempted to bypass state law regarding
changes to public regulations, as it moved to end the traditional clothing-optional
use of a small portion of San Onofre State Beach in
NAC sued, seeking to force DPR to follow state law.
A tentative ruling by the Court favored NAC, but following the presentation of
oral arguments, Judge Sheila Fell said she would withhold a final ruling while
she considers the issue further.
Joining NAC as petitioners are Friends of San Onofre Beach (the local
TNS-affiliated naturist group), as well as individual beach users Allen Baylis
and Gerda Hayes.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
The Naturist Action Committee expects a final ruling within a matter of a few
days. This delay must not be taken as an indication that we won't ultimately
win. It's a reflection of the seriousness with which the judge views this
matter.
WHAT IS NAC ASKING YOU TO DO?
This is a NAC Update. NAC is not asking for your action at this time.
MORE INFORMATION AND RESOURCES
Additional information and links are available, along with this NAC Update on
the web site of the Naturist Action Committee.
www.naturistaction.org/sanonofre
PLEASE HELP NAC TO CONTINUE
HELPING NATURISTS!
NAC is committed to the defense of traditional clothing-optional use of public
land. NAC does not hesitate to hire lawyers and lobbyists when it’s necessary,
but that can be very expensive. NAC does not have a membership roster on which
it can simply assess dues. NAC relies entirely on the voluntary support of
people like YOU.
Won’t you please send a generous donation to:
NAC
PO Box 132
Or call toll free (800) 886-7230 (8AM-4PM, Central Time, weekdays) to donate by
phone using your MasterCard, Visa or Discover Card. Or use your credit card to
make a convenient online donation: www.naturistaction.org/donate/
Thank you for choosing to make a difference.
Naturally,
Bob Morton
Executive Director
Naturist Action Committee
---------------------------------------------------------------
Naturist Action Committee (NAC) - PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903
Executive Dir. Bob Morton - execdir@naturistaction.org
Board Member Allen Baylis - rab@baylislaw.com
Online Rep. Dennis Kirkpatrick - naturist@sunclad.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 8-8-08
New website dedicated to San Onofre
Information
The Naturist Action Committee
has posted a webpage dedicated to making public many documents that we have
obtained from the Department of Parks and Recreation. This page will be updated
as more documents and information become available, so please go to it every so
often to check for new material. The website is at: www.naturistaction.org/sanonofre.
As you probably know, the
Naturist Action Committee and Friends of San Onofre Beach have filed suit in
Orange County Superior Court seeking a court order to compel the DPR to have
public hearings prior to any change in the longstanding Cahill/Harrison policy.
We have received opposition
papers from DPR in response to our Petition, and are composing our reply
papers. We have also sent discovery requests to DPR seeking more information
than was available through the California Public Records Act.
Many of you have contributed
your hard earned dollars to funding this battle. Both Friends of San Onofre
Beach and the Naturist Action Committee are grateful for your support. Without
your donations, we would be unable to take the DPR to task and hold them
accountable to the public they serve.
Again, this is a fight that we can and will win. However, the continued
support of all of you who value our small stretch of beach is vital to winning
this battle.
Donations can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre Beach
Donations can also be made to the Naturist Action Committee: www.naturistaction.org/donate
Update 7-9-08
The Naturist Action
Committee and Friends of San Onofre Beach have taken the battle to save our
beach to court!
Please click here to see the NAC Update for more details
Many of you have been asking what we have been doing over
the past few weeks to move the fight forward. As you probably know, the
Naturist Action Committee had hired a lobbyist to advance our position in
Also, we learned that the primary issue behind the Director’s action is fear that one or more park employees may file a “hostile work environment” lawsuit. Our independent analysis of the likelihood that such a suit would have any merit indicates that it would not.
The issue is now in the courts. This of course was not our preferred method of resolving the matter. But the DPR’s refusal to work with the public they serve rather than engaging in bureaucratic tyranny forced us to take legal action.
Needless to say, this is going to get expensive. This is a fight that we can and will win. However, the continued support of all of you who value our small stretch of beach is vital to winning this battle.
Donations can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre Beach
Donations can also be made to the Naturist Action Committee: www.naturistaction.org
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 6-20-08
The DPR has made several statements to the press. To read my analysis their statements click here: San Onofre Fact or Fiction
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 6-17-08
Friends of San Onofre Beach continues
to work closely with the Naturist Action Committee to reverse the decision to
revoke the Cahill/Harrison Policy at San Onofre. The Naturist Action Committee
has hired a lobbyist in
Many of you have contributed money to help us save our nude beach, but much more work needs to be done, so we still need donations. Many people have asked me how much money they should donate. Well, that of course depends on your personal situation. But consider that most of us buy a State Park annual pass for $125 per year. Isn’t it worth at least that much to help save the beach? Needless to say, all donations are needed in any amount, but consider the value the nude beach brings to your life.
Donations can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre Beach
Donations can also be made to the Naturist Action Committee: www.naturistaction.org
The DPR has been distributing cards stating that “Public nudity at the state parks is, and has been, illegal pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 4322. The Department has not designated any portion of the State Park System as “clothing optional.”
The DPR is choosing to ignore the
Harrison letter sent to all Regional Directors dated June 14, 1988 which set
DPR policy after the
Many of you sent letters and emails to DPR Director Coleman have received letters and emails in response. This is a form letter sent over the signature of Acting District Superintendent Joseph Milligan. (see sample here Parks Answer) If you get one of these letters or emails, I encourage you to respond to Superintendent Milligan, and copy in Director Ruth Coleman. You should make the following points.
Also, if you have not written a letter to Director Coleman yet, it’s not too late. Follow the above guidelines and send it to:
Director Ruth Coleman
Dept. of Parks and Recreation
1416
E-MAIL: director@parks.ca.gov
Thanks to all of you for your continued support of Friends of San Onofre Beach and the Naturist Action Committee. With out help from all of you, the future could be bleak.
Naturally,
Allen
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 6-6-08
Monday June 2nd the Department of Parks and Recreation erected signs purporting to prohibit nudity:


Please do not let these signs scare you away. The survival of our beach depends on everybody continuing to go the beach and using it in the same clothing optional manner as we always have. The DPR has repeatedly stated that they will not issue any citations until after Labor Day. We will hold them to their word.
There has been a great deal of media coverage on this issue, and the press has been generally favorable. Here are some links to articles in the newspapers:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/beach-state-stearns-2055843-san-people
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080606-9999-1n6nude.html
http://www.calcatholic.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=95b722d7-88ea-4360-9533-a5e7db8a07d1
Note the favorable comments by many readers and venom spewed by the “religious” folks.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/beach-public-park-2062167-clothing-state
DPR Sector Superintendent Rich Haydon and DPR spokesman Roy Sterns have been quoted in the media (see articles above) making all manner of negative, misleading and outright false allegations about the beach at Trail 6 and the legal issues surrounding clothing optional use in the State Parks. On the other hand, those of us that have been quoted in the press have presented our side of the story well, and the reader comments have been overwhelmingly positive. It’s time for the DPR to realize that the public at large does not support their effort to close the nude beach.
Friends of San Onofre Beach and the Naturist Action Committee are prepared to take legal action to enforce our rights should negotiations with DPR not produce an agreement.
We need your support in every way possible, including sending letters or emails to DPR Director Ruth Coleman, and financial contributions to Friends of San Onofre Beach and the Naturist Action Committee.
If you have not done so already, please write or email DPR Director Coleman at:
Director Ruth Coleman
Dept. of Parks and Recreation
1416
E-MAIL: director@parks.ca.gov
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE TELEPHONE: (916) 653-8380
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE FAX: (916) 657-3903
To donate to Friends of San Onofre Beach, checks can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre
Beach
To donate to the Naturist Action Committee, go to:
www.naturistaction.org/donate/
You can also stay informed by checking the following websites:
www.naturistaction.org/AlertsAdvisoriesUpdates/Current/current.html
I thank all of you who have already written letters, made financial contributions and been available to talk to the press etc. This likely to be a long and expensive fight. We need everybody’s help. So please do your part to save our beach.
Allen Baylis
SAN ONOFRE UNDER ATTACK
Update 5-30-08
Yesterday, four representatives of the naturist community met with representatives of the Department of Parks and Recreation, including Tony Perez, Southern Division Chief. The naturist included Lloyd Johnson from Blacks Beach Bares two people from the San Onofre Volleyball group, and me as President of Friends of San Onofre Beach and Director of the Naturist Action Committee. We presented our points well and provided documents in support of keeping the Cahill Policy in place at San Onofre.
Coming out of the meeting, we were told that they would consider moving ahead with “public education” campaign and perhaps delay the beginning of enforcement action to a later date. We told them that if the Department was going to delay enforcement, a delay in commencing the “public education” phase was also necessary.
However, the nature of bureaucracies is that any challenge to a decision that has already been made or to the authority to make that decision is met with fierce resistance and an iron fist. It is their firm belief that the only way to rid the park of the criminals in the parking lot, on the Marine Base and the occasional miscreant on our beach is to remove the most supportive and positive influence there, the honest naturists at Trail 6.
Late this afternoon, I receive a call from Tony Perez. He informed me that the decision had been made to delay the commencement of the “public education” phase from June 1 to June 2, as they didn’t want to start on a weekend. They also felt that 30 days was not long enough to get the word out to enough people and they also didn’t want to interfere with the July 4th holiday on the beach. He left the issue as to when the enforcement phase would start open.
We encourage you to continue to come to the beach and enjoy it as always. Do not be intimidated if a ranger comes up to you to “educate” you. Be polite, but also remember that you have the right to be left alone.
We are not going to take this laying down. Friends of San Onofre Beach and the Naturist Acton Committee are working hard on the next steps. No option is off the table, and we are willing to go the mat to save our beach. Your assistance and contribution are extremely important.
To donate to Friends of San Onofre Beach, checks can be sent to:
Friends of San Onofre
Beach
To donate to the Naturist Action Committee, go to:
www.naturistaction.org/donate/
May 21, 2008
San Onofre Nude Beach Under
Attack
Dear San Onofre Friends,
Friends of San Onofre Beach was formed in 1995 by my predecessor, Marianna Handler. At the time, clothing optional use of our beach was threatened by incidents of illegal lewd behavior on the beach. Our beach is again threatened by a combination of irresponsible individuals engaging in illegal conduct of a sexual nature, and a change in local park management, who are willing to sacrifice the rights of the many law abiding naturists in order to rid the beach of the few miscreants. The people who engage in lewd conduct at the beach have always been laboring under the mistaken belief that, since nudity at the beach is illegal (which it is not) then they are free to engage in whatever kind of illegal (and it is illegal) lewd behavior they wish.
As you all know, Friends of San Onofre Beach has always promoted adherence to standard clothing optional beach etiquette and denounced the lewd conduct on the beach. We have worked well with the previous park management and maintained a cordial relationship with the rangers on the ground at trail 6. We have encouraged everyone on the beach to assist in curbing lewd behavior by warning those who engage in such conduct to stop whenever we see it happening. We have always told everyone on the beach that the fastest way to lose our right to be nude on the beach is to allow lewd behavior by others to continue. We have always advocated zero tolerance for lewd behavior. Having said that, many beach regulars have taken a more lazie-fair attitude.
Late in the afternoon on Monday May 19th, Rich Haydon, the new Sector Superintendent for San Onofre, contacted me. He told me that Ruth Coleman, Director of California Department of Parks and Recreation had issued an order revoking the longstanding “Cahill Policy” as it applies to the San Onofre trail 6 area, effective June 1, 2008. Those of you who saw me and spoke to me on the beach last Saturday will recall that I had said that all was well with the rangers and park management. Needless to say, I was shocked and incensed by the revelation. I assure you that we will not take this laying down. I have been working closely with the Naturist Action Committee and have contacted the office of DPR Director Coleman’s office. Saving our beach is not a one-man job. All of you will be called upon to participate in the effort.
Obviously, local park management saw fit to exclude the public that they are sworn to serve in order to keep them in the dark about the proposed change in policy. When I asked Mr. Haydon why the naturist community had not been contacted prior to announcing the change in policy, he stated that they were not required to involve us in the decision making process. This can be seen only as a sneak attack by local park management.
So what is their supposed justification? According to Mr. Haydon, the “escalating” number of incidents of lewd conduct has created a “sexually charged atmosphere” in the park. The term “sexually charged atmosphere” is a legal term relating to sexual harassment in the workplace. Essentially, their claim is that park employees have complained that they are being subjected to a “sexually charged atmosphere” and therefore could sue the state on grounds of sexual harassment. These claims are alleged to have come form not only rangers, but also maintenance workers and even those working at the entrance gate. I believe that this absurd claim is the result of local management’s search for an excuse to close the beach to nudity that they believed would have the best chance to succeed. However, the theory has many flaws, some of which may be obvious, and some not so much so.
Any time government acts in secret; the public should be extremely suspicious of its motives and the alleged justification for the action. Yesterday afternoon, Tony Perez, DPR Southern Division Chief, contacted me. We had a long and productive conversation. However, one statement he made cleared up my question as to what was really going on. He has been told, and related to me, that the vast majority of visitors to trail 6 go there for the purpose of engaging in illegal lewd conduct. We all know better than that. Clearly, someone is on a mission to close the beach to nudity and is willing to do anything to make it happen.
On the other hand, Mr. Perez did admit that DPR should have sought public input on the issue prior to making a decision, and has agreed to meet with me and other representatives of the naturist community. Also, there is a possibility that the policy change may be put on hold until further discussion of the issues can be had.
This situation is evolving rapidly, and I have been working
closely with the Naturist Action Committee, of which I am a board member. There
are many options being explored, including litigation and hiring a lobbyist in
The chickens have come home to roost. Zero tolerance for lewd conduct must be maintained. We must also work to discourage people from trespassing onto the marine base. This is necessary because the base has been a safe haven for people engaging in lewd conduct, which has spilled over onto our beach. We simply cannot allow this to happen any longer. I know this will be painful for some of you, but there simply is no other way to bring about the changes necessary to save the beach.
We will be having a rally at San Onofre on Saturday, May 24 at 10:00 AM. Please plan to attend to support our efforts to save our beach, and to learn the latest information on what you can do to help and what FOSOB and NAC are doing. If you can make a sign to support our beach, please bring it.
See you there, and thank you for your support.
R. Allen Baylis, Esq.
President, Friends of San Onofre Beach
Director, Naturist Action Committee